Ammonia Evolved

It’s funny. We’ve been working with biofuels for decades and are familiar with biodiesel, ethanol, biobutanol, syngas etc. Now, late in the day and basically from out of left field, we have another equally fascinating biofuel story to add. Ammonia. This organic chemical (NH3) is well known and understood. It is used in fertilizer, dyes, explosives, plastics, refrigerants, textiles, water purification, pesticides, as a nutritional supplement and in pharmaceuticals. It is less known as a combustion engine fuel. This comes just as the possibility of a transition from polluting grey ammonia to carbon free green ammonia emerges. Farms in the future may be able to be 100% sustainable by using green ammonia as a fertilizer and it could also be cheaper than today’s huge market in fossil-fuel sourced, grey ammonia.

Ammonia is a toxic gas at room temperature and liquifies under slight pressure. It has a distinct, strong, pungent odor and is corrosive to alkaline metals such as aluminum, zinc and magnesium. It is just over half as dense as air, in which it will quickly rise and disperse. Its very useful to store fuels as liquids to obtain the highest energy density and transportation convenience. Ammonia transitions from gas to liquid (boiling point) at just -33.33 °C. In contrast, the natural gas boiling point is all the way down at -160 °C and hydrogen is even more challenging at -253 °C. Ammonia is much easier to maintain in storage tanks and has no flash point so a naked flame will not ignite it.

Ammonia’s story is nothing short of a thriller, complete with mad scientists, Nobel Prizes, romance, wars, famine and huge challenges that even nature had difficulty solving. Plants need nitrogen but not all plants can incorporate it even though 78% of the atmosphere is nitrogen gas. All plants, whether they fix nitrogen themselves, as some do, or find it in the soil, use nitrates to make proteins including essential molecules like DNA. Crop plant roots quickly exhaust the nitrates present in soils. To compensate for depleted soils, farmers in the late 19th Century had been employing increasing amounts of guano fertilizer. Guano is formed of bird and bat excrement that accumulated, undisturbed, on remote islands for thousands of years. The Industrial Revolution had significantly improved living conditions but the increasing demand for food caused farmers to increase agricultural yields with guano fertilizer. New agricultural production in the fresh and fertile soils of the expansive European, Russian and US plains helped matters, but by the end of the century supplies of guano were running out and the human population had grown to 1.6 billion.

In the autumn of 1898 the incoming president of the British Academy of Sciences, Sir William Crookes, gave an alarmist inaugural speech in which he explained that unless a replacement for guano was found, there would be widespread human starvation. His message reverberated widely in the media. He even stated, specifically and presciently, in his speech that, “…it is the chemist who must come to the rescue”. Was humanity doomed?

Sure enough, in 1908, a German chemist, Fritz Haber discovered a way to produce ammonia using pressure and heat. He initially used expensive osmium as a catalyst. Another German scientist, Carl Bosch, scaled production up to 20 tons per day by 1913, using common iron as the catalyst making the process much more economical. Both scientists were awarded the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1918. However, within the euphoria was camouflaged another, more sinister need for nitrates.

Smoky, expensive gunpowder had been replaced by nitrate compounds by 1846 making ammunition propellant smokeless and 6 times more powerful. The British Government realized that nitrates were a strategic necessity for production of ammunition and explosives in a period of growing geopolitical uncertainty. The British expected Germany would run out of munitions if Great Britain controlled the nitrate supply. Instead, the surprise development of the Haber Bosch process made nitrates from atmospheric nitrogen and hydrogen from plentiful German coal. Haber and Bosch enabled the First World War to continue for 5 long, bloody years, and also enabled Germany to use poisonous chlorine gas in that war. Clara Immerwahr, Haber’s wife, also a chemist, fatally shot herself out of shame for her husband’s grisly contributions to the war. Despite helping Germany’s cause in the First World War, he was forced to flee Germany for the UK due to mounting antisemitism. Haber’s welcome in the UK was also strained by his First World War activities. He finally found a job in Israel but died from a heart-attack in a Swiss hotel on the way there.

The discovery of a way to make fertilizer created an industrial-scale activity and over the following century, the Haber Bosch process helped the human population continue to grow to its current level of 7.97 billion (August 2022). Humanity is now totally dependent on the continued production of ammonia. 80% of ammonia production is converted into fertilizer, and then to other nitrates and urea at further cost. As we have stated, ammonia is unusually productive with at least 13 other commercial uses. 50% of the nitrogen atoms in our bodies come from foods which used fertilizer from the Haber Bosch process. It should be mentioned that other fertilizing agents such as phosphates, along with selective planting and genetic selection, have also increased global crop yields.

Ammonia is made by squeezing together a single atom of nitrogen with three atoms of hydrogen. Traditionally the hydrogen came from and consumed a lot of fossil fuel. Indeed, 2% of all CO2 emissions can be traced to the Haber Bosch process, as well as emissions of nitrous oxides (N2O) and methane. 3.16 tons of CO2 are emitted for every ton of grey ammonia currently produced. We are going to continue to need huge industrial scale amounts of ammonia. Pre-war Ukraine was the second largest producer of ammonia for fertilizer. The coincidence of war and a shortage of natural gas has increased the price of ammonia from $250 per ton in 2020 to $1,600 per ton by April of 2022. 

Weekly ammonia prices from Jan 1, 2020, to April 29, 2022. Source: EIA.

The huge, destructive, global scale of grey ammonia production has focused attention on the possibility of generating green ammonia instead. Lower carbon emissions ammonia is widely demanded and there have been many efforts to manufacture it. Indeed, until the wide availability of natural gas, which was a significantly cheaper feedstock for ammonia production, the hydrogen part of the equation was initially sourced by using hydropower to electrolyze water. The problem there was that you were still stuck with the same Haber Bosch process once you have your hydrogen. Although there has been a lot of effort made to find an alternative to Haber Bosch (especially in Australia), almost all of the many green ammonia initiatives basically replace fossil fuel energy for sustainable energy on the front end and find the hydrogen from electrolyzing water. This means that the resulting product, like other green fuels, is often more expensive than grey ammonia. A large amount of energy is still needed to combine the nitrogen with the hydrogen using high temperatures and high pressure. New methods necessitate trial and error, but there are signs that emerging technological approaches can scale production of green ammonia at significant cost reduction. This realistic, pragmatic vision suggests that farmers can now use green ammonia to replace diesel fuel for farm vehicles and electrical generation and finally for fertilizer itself, all at a lower cost and with a zero emissions footprint.

The ammonia market is huge and the need for a sustainable green alternative is already acting as an accelerant to increasing green ammonia activity. While it will take a bit of time for the capacity of green ammonia to build, there is no doubt that the ammonia market is being disrupted right now!

20 Emissions Reduction Behaviors

Solving climate change needs two things; preventing CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions and taking existing CO2 out of the atmosphere. Solving the climate change issue will depend on both happening. Removing CO2 from the atmosphere is the subject of ongoing research. This list focuses on preventing emissions. On average, every person in America emits about 17 tons of CO2 every year! We found these 20 actions that you can take, which reduce emissions, some immediately and others over time.

Here we go:

1. Audit your own carbon emissions. This at least puts you in the picture about what your personal situation is. You can hire experts or simply fill out a questionnaire online to assess how much carbon you produce. By doing this you will be in the best position to decide whether to offset, acquire sustainable equipment, or change your behavior. Here are some useful emissions auditing websites:

https://co2.myclimate.org/en/

https://www3.epa.gov/carbon-footprint-calculator/

https://www.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx

2. Offset your carbon emissions. Your personal analysis will show how much CO2 you generate from, flying, driving, or heating and cooling your house or business. Available offsets include capping leaky old oil wells, planting trees, extracting CO2 or other greenhouse gases, such as methane or natural gas, from the air and many other methods.

To offset your emissions by capping wells you can go to: www.welldonefoundation.com or call 406 460 003 and buy carbon offsets in the form of Climate Benefit Units (CBUs) for $7.00 per ton. 17 CBUs for $119.00 represents the average amount of CO2 previously mentioned ($7.00/ton for 17 tons per person per year). Sometimes the activity resulting in emissions also offers an immediate offset. When you fly for example, make sure you select the offset option when you buy your ticket or if it is not available find one of the many offsets that are available. Flying emissions represent about 5% of global CO2 emissions so it is important at least until the fuel that planes consume is carbon neutral to address this source of CO2. A one-way trip from New York to Los Angeles, for instance, creates 1,237 pounds of CO2. The best carbon offset companies will be transparent about their methods. Here are some which can offset your CO2 for a price:

https://www.cooleffect.org/content/donate

https://sustainabletravel.org/our-work/carbon-offsets/calculate-footprint/

https://offset.earth/

3. Offset your shopping too. Shopping deserves a separate mention because it combines any of the worst emissions activities that we all do in some form. Transportation is one (see #2), but purchasing single-item transactions, which the internet is known for, creates packaging and logistics activities that result in even more emissions. Tackling these converging behaviors is easy by using a service such as EcoCart (https://ecocart.io/). This offsets the power you use and everything else about your order giving you access to 10,000 different shops and climbing! Equivalent groups provide such services both inside and outside the US.

4. Use light emitting diode light bulbs (LEDs). These are now almost as cheap as the old hot kind of incandescent bulbs but consume only 15% of the electricity.

5. Replace your fossil electricity supply with renewable electricity. This is simpler than it sounds. In New York for example, ConEdison, the local utility, offers Independent Power Producers (IPPs) access to the grid so they can sell their emissions-free power. Many, like Clean Choice employ 100% renewable energy.

6. Replace your gas cooking range with an induction range. While still more expensive, chefs say induction ranges are better than gas and use less energy. It’s like a cooking LED.

7. Install a heat pump. These come in air or ground sourced options to provide all your winter heating and hot water. This technology extracts the heat from the cold outdoors just like your fridge extracts heat from its freezing interior. Heat pumps are extremely economic and, if you do this, there are no further emissions of CO2 from burning oil or gas. Imagine the impact if everyone did this!

8. Install insulation in your house. This means you need less energy (of any kind) to heat or cool your house.

9. Exploit “passive systems” to cool and heat your house. In the winter you can use the solar greenhouse effect with a conservatory or skylight windows together with heat exchangers. In the summer you can use breezes, evaporation vessels and updraft chimneys to ventilate and cool an interior. It is easier to select these things when you build or buy a house, but it is also very possible to retrofit an existing property.

10. Plant many trees. Seeds can be bought on Amazon for pennies, and you can select local species. If everyone on the planet planted 132 trees each, we would have reached a trillion-tree target that studies show will annually take out a decades’ worth of all the carbon mankind has generated. If you live in the city and have no access to appropriate land, the best thing to do is offset your emissions by getting the trees planted for you (#2). The tree planting experts will also ensure they go about it the right way and plant indigenous species, protect ecosystems and water supplies.

These websites will help:

https://www.plant-for-the-planet.org to download a tree planting app.

https://www.gff.global for the Global Forest Fund.

11. Install renewable power. Solar costs dropped 81% in a decade and those cost declines are expected to continue. You have two choices. You can pay for your own installation or have a system installed for free and then pay for the electricity you get. Either way, you can reduce your electricity cost significantly over time.

12. Buy an electric vehicle (EV). The acceleration will blow your mind and you can get 3 miles to the kilowatt hour. You can charge your vehicle at home and now a rapidly expanding charging infrastructure makes it easier to keep your vehicle charged on longer trips. Even if you charge with coal electricity, the high efficiency of the EV motor means you significantly reduce pollution per mile compared with gasoline.

13. Use biofuels in your internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. ICE vehicles will still be around for a long time so biofuels are the way emissions can be reduced. In a gasoline vehicle, drivers do not have much control over their fuel, although the main option for reducing emissions currently is a 10% corn ethanol blend in the US. However, if you drive a diesel engine, you can fill your tank with 100% biodiesel or other blends, and you can consult a local map of filling stations to find a convenient location.

14. Rideshare or carpool. As the world opens back up for commuting again, use ride sharing services or carpools as opposed to taking a taxi or driving your own vehicle alone.

15. Sell polluting company’s stock that may still be in your equity portfolio. Invest in companies where most of their activities are in sustainable goods and services instead.

16. Reduce your carbon FOODPRINT. Animals raised for meat emit methane which is 21 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas. As well as eating less meat, also buy locally produced food to cut distribution emissions.

17. Do not buy single-use plastics. If you must, recycle them. Select products with less packaging or post-consumer recycled plastic or sustainable packaging. Soap, beverages, and food packaging are among the worst waste-plastic offenders. A laundry soap company like Earth Breeze manufactures laundry soap sheets made from plants, packaged in biodegradable card, both of which are benign when flushed into the waste stream. Cheap biodegradable plastics are on the way.

18. Make your vote count. Vote for politicians who support policies which reduce and eliminate fossil fuel usage and reduce emissions.

19. Use video calls to meet with people. To reduce emissions, celebrate some holidays and do more business meetings by video call. Use one of the many group meeting software products available including:

Zoom, BlueJeans, UberConference, RingCentral Meetings, Microsoft Teams, Webex Meetings, GoToMeeting and Join.me.

20. Help to spread the message that addressing climate change is not a huge, expensive burden for humanity. If everybody does even a little bit of this list, it collectively represents a huge environmental step forward.

Mark and Shola do a Podcast with Barry Cinnamon

Its a weekly 30 minute talk show that runs every Saturday on KDOW Radio AM in San Jose California. Every week Barry provides practical money-saving tips on ways to reduce your home and business energy consumption. Barry Cinnamon heads up Cinnamon Energy Systems (a San Jose residential and commercial  solar and energy storage contractor) and Spice Solar (suppliers of built-in solar racking technology). After 10,000+ installations at Akeena Solar and Westinghouse Solar, he's developed a pretty good perspective on the real-world economics of rooftop solar. Mark made a pre-IPO investment in Akeena Solar in 2006 for the New Energy Fund, LP, the first renewable energy hedge fund in the US, and sold it two years later at a value 16 times greater than his initial investment. Barry is one of the nation's guru's in the solar market and his podcast has an avuncular, informative and friendly tone blended with a barely concealed enthusiasm for the subject.

 

Lithium Ion Batteries and the Capacitor or Electrical Energy Storage Device (EESD)

The price of lithium has climbed steeply in recent weeks. Citibank believes demand will be 64% higher in the coming 5 years. Lithium is the ubiquitous energy storage element consumed in ever greater quantities with each new generation of mobile phones and the arrival of electric cars by many manufacturers led by Tesla. Tesla also market their Power Wall battery, made in a new lithium battery ‘mega factory’. They are all looking for additional lithium supplies suggesting that the price of the metal will continue to be firm, but lithium has some real competition ahead.

In the formula for energy contained in a capacitor:

E = (0.5 x C) x v2

Energy (Joules) = ½ x Capacitance (Farads) x voltage squared

With regard to this formula we see companies obtaining significant increases in capacitor energy density either by an increasing capacitance or by increasing the voltage.

UK based Dr. Robert Murray Smith, chairman of Edison Power, a private US company, has been making a series of congenial and easy to understand informational videos that are available on YouTube that show something fascinating; the emergence of graphene as a component of batteries and capacitors. This is just beginning to shake up the electrical component market. Graphene is safe. A baby can swallow it without consequence since it’s just carbon. It can be composted. It doesn’t heat up and is extremely common. If capacitors obtain higher energy storage, then the lithium ion battery industry could easily have a lot of stranded lithium assets within a few years. Why?

Capacitors have always been the envy of batteries for a couple of very good reasons. They are very fast to charge and discharge. Some have dry electrolytes which means that they can cycle almost infinitely but even wet electrolytes can make it to 100,000 cycles. These characteristics are a just a dream for chemical batteries which are often limited to fewer than 1,000 cycles and have a very slow charge and discharge times of many hours. Up until this point though, chemical batteries have taken the lead in terms of energy capacity. Battery construction is all about volumes of chemicals while capacitors are about the huge, charge holding surface area of the electrodes. Activated carbon from an organic source such as coconuts will offer 1,500 square meters per gram but other forms of carbon including graphene, offer up to 3,000 square meters per gram of valuable, electron sheltering, surface area, the equivalent of 11.5 tennis courts. Such high surface areas are also able to be further improved by nanotechnology. The path to further improvements in such high capacitance is to find solutions to challenges such as inhibiting electric fields generated within the capacitor, a common issue in microchip design.

Improvements today have allowed the energy density of supercapacitors to reach 131 Watt hours per kilogram, four times the previous level and 65% of the 200 Wh/kg offered by lithium ion. Dr. Lu Wu of Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, in South Korea has generated a form of graphene that lets him store the full equivalent of lithium ion batteries.

A good metaphor is an open-top glass vase and a normal bottle, say a wine bottle, with a thin neck, both full of water. The vase is like the capacitor. When it’s tipped over, all the water comes out immediately and you can fill it up fast too. In electrical terms, all the available stored energy comes out all at once, the equivalent of a high power rating. The bottle on the other hand, is like the battery. When tipped the water comes out of its neck at a limited rate and it takes much longer to empty. The same is true of filling it up or recharging it again.

For example, on a cold morning, you may have difficulty starting your car. The cold, lead acid battery can’t provide enough energy all at once, to turn over the starter motor. If you attach a supercapacitor to the cold battery for a few minutes though, you can charge up the capacitor and then use it to discharge this electricity much faster, and start the engine. Another example is where the battery and capacitor work together combining their capabilities. A bus might need a lot of power when it’s accelerating, but batteries can only partially help. Super-capacitors already charged from the battery though, can dump enough energy on that electric motor to make sure acceleration goes without a hitch.

Many electric vehicles have regenerative breaking, where the turning wheels spin the motor(s) in reverse, creating resistance that slows the vehicle. The motors generate electricity which can be very economically saved in the batteries. If the bus has regenerative braking, its lithium ion batteries will be unable to absorb the charge fast enough. Luckily, capacitors can rapidly absorb all the electrical energy from the brakes first and then feed it at an appropriate rate to the lithium-ion batteries. This teaming up of battery and capacitor is only a temporary phenomenon however.

The arrival on the scene of graphene has caused capacitors to suddenly have a significant amount of energy density instead of simply power. This is a key distinction. Until this point, a chemical battery had energy but not power while the capacitor has power but not energy. This relationship is now undergoing rapid transformation.

Since first writing this blog, I have met with CEO Stephen Voller of Zap & Go from Oxford, UK, who have another graphene offering and are on the verge of commercialization with a working energy storage to charge your phone. Also I have found another grid smoothing company in Europe as well as a Spanish group called Graphenano who are making strong claims that are still waiting to be verified. Edison Power, affiliated with earlier mentioned Sunvault, is the second case and has increased the capacitance using graphene with its large surface area. The result is that you also obtain an elevated energy storage level.

Combining both high capacitance with high voltage has been elusive to date. An example of a company that has increased the voltage component of the formula is Eestor, a Texas based capacitor company headed up by CEO, Ian Clifford. They have managed to combine a very high functioning dielectric, barium titanate, between electric plates operating at very high voltages. Eestor’s voltages are as high as 3,500 volts, meaning that the capacitors have a significant amount of energy capacity, rivaling the lithium-ion battery. Even a single, 1 Farad capacitance at 3,500 volts means the capacitor holds 1.7 kilowatt hours of electrical energy. These particular, disruptive capacitors are intended to address the demand/supply, grid smoothing market and will have few competitors.

It’s clear that in this environment, a safe, cheap, fast charging and discharging, electrical energy storage device (EESD) that can cycle endlessly has huge advantages. Maybe lithium’s days are numbered?

The First Commercial, Non-Intermittent, Fully Sustainable Private House

In the summer of 2015, we were invited to a dwelling near Princeton, NJ, by Mike Strizky, an engineer and CTO for a company called H/Cell. They were celebrating their first commercial commissioning. A lady in New Jersey had agreed to have them install 40 kW of solar in a stretch of lawn in front of her ranch house. This is clearly more than she needs for her modest house, but its very interesting from the point of view of sustainability.

Some of the solar electricity is sold back to the grid, earning hefty SREC's for her during the year. She obviously uses some of the power directly. Some of it goes into charging a bank of 24 volt batteries on the wall of the garage where the invertors were also situated.

Back out in the garden was a small closet sized electrical box. Inside there was an electrolyzer, which used some of the solar electricity to split water into hydrogen H2 and oxygen O2. They vented the O2 but pumped the H2 into a 1,000-gallon propane tank buried beneath the lawn. The hydrogen was available to be put through the fuel cell, also in the box, where it combines with O2 already in the air (the atmosphere is 21% oxygen) and generates electricity, heat and water.

First of all she needs no electricity from the grid. In any conditions she has enough power to run her house and all its modern lifestyle accoutrements such as an efficient induction cooking range in the kitchen and an immersion heater for hot water, normally deemed an expensive way to make hot water. In the event of another super hurricane such as Sandy, she will be able to continue running on the hydrogen tank and batteries alone for 10 days, but with the solar panels still working there will be no running out of power in either location.

If she had either a fuel cell or an electric car, she would be able to charge it. Indeed, Toyota chose the venue as an opportunity to come and demonstrate the Mirai fuel cell vehicle which runs on H2 and could easily take some from the H2 tank. A Tesla would just as easily be able to recharge on the abundant electricity.

In Strizky's own house not far away, he has a similar pioneering set up, but additionally uses the H2 to cook his food, heat his water and also for his jacuzzi. These are loads he uses principally to demonstrate that a modern house can use the plentiful energy available to meet the full demands of a modern family dwelling. He also uses the solar electricity available in the system to generate the H2 and charge a battery bank.

These installations are the top end and very unlike the 5 kW solar installations that might be more typical of a simple Solar City solar panel installation. Coming in at sometimes well over $100,000 they nonetheless show us that reliable off the shelf equipment is available that can effectively reduce the human footprint entirely. The prices are coming down as the efficiency is always climbing and the dream of self-sufficiency, and a small footprint becomes ever more available.

An Old Technology Becomes an Efficient Way to Process Cellulose

Mark Cox and Olushola Ashiru, NEF Advisors, LLC.

Global efforts to reduce greenhouse gases have led to the growth of biofuels and carbon neutrality. In the US, ethanol originates from the corn crop (as well as sugar cane) where the starch in the corn kernels is fermented and distilled. Using corn for fuel in the US absorbs 40% of the annual corn harvest and produces about 15 billion gallons of ethanol. This, initially caused corn prices to climb, affecting food markets globally. The effectiveness and energy balance of corn ethanol is critical. Farmer’s have done their best to optimize the efficiency via innovation and process engineering. Ethanol is blended with gasoline in the US to become approximately 10% of the American gasoline liquid fuel.

Cellulose is composed of sugar and is an ideal alternative to corn or the juice from sugar cane. As a non-food biofuel feedstock, cellulose reduces GHG by 88%, while corn and other precious foods used for fuel offer just a 20% GHG reduction. Cellulose is abundant, carbon neutral and is an existing bi-product of food production in agricultural wastes. Sugar cane bagasse and the corn plant (including the stover) alone produce multiples of the sugar that the food part of those plants currently produces. The staggering promise of cellulosic biofuels has of course brought out the best in innovative capabilities.

The cellulose molecule has defenses that have made it extremely difficult to break down. Scientists call this ‘recalcitrance’. Below are four imperfect techniques to release the underlying plant’s sugars. Various governments of the world and hundreds of companies have invested billions of dollars into researching solutions for this challenge and in June of 2015, decision makers are still unaware of any efficient, economic, scalable solutions. 

1.     Acid hydrolysis employs the use of dilute acids to bathe the cellulose. You can also use alkali chemicals to reduce the cellulose and the different approaches have different success rates at converting the biomass.

2.    Enzymes are nature’s way of accessing the sugars available in biomass. Inevitably they are more like costly drug companies with white coated Ph.D.’s than any elegant solution they pretend to be. 

3.    Gasification is a way to heat or pyrolyze biomass until it releases its organic molecules as gas, or syngas. Extremophile bacteria consume the syngas and release ethanol.

4.   Using the Supercritical water method, the biomass is heated with water, in a pressure cooker. At high temperature and pressure the water and steam become a plasma in which the lignocellulosic material simply falls apart.

 Using ‘pretreatment’ used in the first two methods, breaks up the material. Chemicals, steam or solvents persuade the lignin to let go. These methods are rarely cheap, rarely quick and almost never have 100% conversion. The aforementioned qualities however are found with the 145 year old ball mill.

The ball mill is so simple it can hardly be called a technology. An electric motor rotates a metal cylinder with ball bearings inside. These pummel anything that is placed inside into a powder with particle size as small as 5 nanometers with no expensive chemicals or high temperatures. Talcum powder or cement are existing and familiar ball mill products. It achieves consistent residence times of 15 minutes and obtains 100% conversion of any source of lignocellulosic biomass into its constituents; lignin, C5 and C6 sugars even without any liquids. The low input costs suggest the final price of the finished sugar can be lower than 5 cents per lb. compared to $0.12/lb., current global market price. In retrospect, the ball mill is the elegant, convenient, fast, simple and economic solution that the world has been looking for to reduce cellulose.